RE: SMC 17C.300: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS – REVIEW AND SUGGESTED UPDATES

 

April 21, 2022 

 

RE: SMC 17C.300: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS – REVIEW AND SUGGESTED UPDATES


Dear Spokane Planning, Ms. Murphy, Plan Commission, and Councilmembers:

 

Thank you for your work in implementing the city’s Housing Action Plan, and for moving the needle forward on greater housing supply.

As you’re well aware, there is a critical need to increase housing supply in Spokane. We are simply failing at producing the needed numbers that will result in 6,791 new units by 2037 (or 400+ units per year) per the City’s 2020 Housing Needs Assessment. Unless bold changes are made, then we will continue to push would-be home-owners and renters, and community members to the margins.

Please consider moving quickly in adopting and codifying relaxed and flexible standards for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) as a preliminary, ‘low-hanging fruit’, opportunity. I would encourage the Plan Commission and City Council to ratify polices suggested by in RCW 36.70A.600(1)(n),(o),(p),(q),and (x) regarding additional flexibility, and lessening restrictions, for accessory dwelling units.

The draft changes to “17C.300 SMC Accessory Dwelling Units” attempt to ratify some of these policies.

Please consider the following suggestions / modifications to the proposed draft ADU updates: 

·       17C.300.100 (B)(2) – Multiple ADUs in all Residential Zones may be permitted through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP).

·       17C.300.100 (B)(2) – Development standards of the underlying district may be modified pursuant to the provisions of this section.

·       17C.300.110 (A)(1) – Reduce minimum size of principal structure to 500 square feet.

·       17C.300.110 (A)(1)(a) – Floor area of internal ADU not more than 50% the floor area of the principal structure, or 800 square feet, whichever is greater.

·       17C.300.110 (A)(2) – Per WA House Bill 1660 - Floor area of detached ADU not more than 850 square feet for lots less than 4,500 square feet, and 1,350 square feet as the combined floor area for both attached and detached ADUs on lots greater than 4,500 square feet. 

·       17C.300.110 (B) – Per RCW 36.70A.600(1)(p) - Remove owner-occupancy requirements, i.e. ‘Draft Option SMC 110.C.1’

·       17C.300.130 (A)(5) - Remove all off-street parking requirement, i.e. 'Draft Option SMC 130.A5.1'

Thank you for your consideration and seeking to address dire need.

With Regards,

GrannyFlatSpokane

ryan@grannyflatspokane.com 

Popular posts from this blog

Introducing Granny Flats Spokane!

Image
  Hello World!  Spokane needs housing... and fast!  There are no easy answers, and there's a wide range of options, and opinions on how we make up for the estimated county-wide backlog of over 30,000 units.  GrannyFlatsSpokane (GFS for short) is a platform for ideas. There are many questions, and currently a lack of solutions.  How does the Spokane community increase  housing - and grow its population - without jeopardizing quality of life? How do decisions on where, what type, and how much housing affect neighborhood character? How can the right development "framework" (think design standards, zoning, transportation, utilities and services) actually improve the quality of life for existing, and new, residents?  These are the issues which GrannyFlatsSpokane would like to explore!  Would you join me?  Please send your comments and ideas to  contact@grannyflatspokane.com . I'd love to hear from you.   Cheers! - Ryan 
Read more

The Current Housing Conundrum (in Spokane and beyond....)

Image
Our quality of life is at risk. The costs of housing have skyrocketed in recent years. Rents have increased by 14% in the past year alone!   It has become increasingly difficult to find, and afford, the type of housing needed for all of Spokane’s residents, and for all family types through every season of life. A healthy community is one that hosts an array of housing options , choices, and price levels. However, the current economy has forced most residents to pay more than 1/3 of household income on housing, pushing vulnerable residents to the edge. For too long, housing developers in both the city and county have been presented with a binary choice : to build either singular family homes – most larger sizes and larger lots – or to build high density, multi-family apartment complexes in areas unsuitable for density. Due to zoning restrictions and other political-economic factors, the community has had to endure development of multi-plex-units built in unsuitable locations. Oft
Read more